CADi · Legal operations
What does no single case file show you?
Examine patterns across intake, financial-crime checks, supervision, deadlines and Ai-assisted work, giving your firm a view across the caseload.
Bring us a problem, a suspected opportunity or a result that does not add up. We can explore how CADi CaseShield could help, starting with your question and the evidence available.
Get in touchA law firm's risk is spread across every case: intake and conflicts, AML, supervision, deadlines, and now Ai-assisted work. Each is a recurring decision, and a failure in any one - a missed deadline nobody owned - can become a claim or a regulatory matter.
When one of those decisions is questioned, defending it means going back to the file and reconstructing what was done and why. Across a whole caseload, that reconstruction is exactly what a compliance officer, an insurer or a regulator cannot rely on being consistent.
CADi CaseShield evidences how a law firm's cross-case risk decisions - intake, AML, supervision, deadlines, Ai-assisted work - were governed, alongside the firm's own systems. It does not practise law or replace a solicitor's supervision.
For each recurring risk decision it produces the policy applied, the rationale, the counterfactual and an immutable trace, packaged so a compliance officer, a supervising partner, an insurer or the regulator can rely on it without reconstructing the file. The accountable human stays accountable.
A firm-wide record for each recurring risk decision - intake, AML, supervision, deadlines, Ai-assisted work - rather than a per-file reconstruction.
Packaged so a compliance officer, a supervising partner, an insurer or the regulator can rely on it directly, without going back to the file.
It evidences how the decision was governed; it does not practise law or replace a solicitor's supervision - accountability stays with the person.
Covers the cross-case seams where a firm is exposed, so a failure in any one is defensible rather than an orphaned gap.
Firms carrying cross-case risk across intake, AML, supervision and deadlines, who must defend how each recurring decision was handled.
The compliance and supervision owners accountable for the firm-wide standard, who need one reliable record rather than a per-file rebuild.
CADi CaseShield analyses the relevant decision history alongside your existing systems. We agree the question, available evidence and causal assumptions with your team, then examine the reasoning and plausible alternatives.
The people responsible retain the decision. Historical analysis can deepen into a continuous evidence feed where useful; the findings support review and learning rather than replacing professional judgement.
CADi is in production - its engines are live in the cloud - with nine UK patent applications pending. CADi CaseShield evidences how a decision was governed; it does not practise law, replace a solicitor's supervision, or guarantee a regulatory outcome.
Causal analysis runs on a declared model of the decision environment. Its conclusions depend on that model, the available evidence and explicit assumptions; estimates are analytical approximations. The engine has been tested against injected, synthetic and real ingested data. Live-outcome validation is completed against each client's own outcomes during deployment.