OPEN R&D PARTNERSHIPS
These are product directions, not off-the-shelf claims. We are looking for organisations with domain expertise, a serious research question and a responsible route to real-world validation.
Joint research
A shared question, explicit hypotheses and a validation plan.
Responsible evidence
Partner-controlled data, bounded claims and accountable deployment.
A route to product
Research first; prototype, evidence and commercial shape follow.
NINE DIRECTIONS · ONE ENGINE
Each film is a schematic produced in Remotion. It shows the proposed decision mechanism, not a measured result or a claim that the engine has already been validated in that environment.
REMOTION FILM 01THE PROMPT EVENT
Causal prompt-injection detection for LLM applications - the decision to trust an input, governed and defensible like any other.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Develop and validate causal tests for adversarial prompts at the trust boundary, including when to allow, block or escalate.
REMOTION FILM 02ORGANISATIONAL ALIGNMENT
Board-grade evidence that the organisation's decisions actually track its stated purpose and values - evidence, not assertion.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Test how stated purpose can be translated into observable decision-level evidence without reducing culture to a score.
REMOTION FILM 03INSURANCE CLAIMS
Evidences how a claim was governed across the tension between fair settlement and claims leakage.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Build a defensible claims decision model with domain experts, then validate its counterfactual and fairness evidence.
REMOTION FILM 04ONBOARDING
Evidences how an onboarding decision was made - accept, reject or escalate - alongside the firm's own KYC stack.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Study how onboarding evidence can expose policy, rationale and escalation quality while keeping the accountable firm in control.
REMOTION FILM 05SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY
Evidences how an alert was dispositioned - SAR or no-SAR. The MLRO still makes the call; the record attests how it was reached.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Explore decision-level AML evidence with an accountable MLRO, focusing on trace quality rather than automating the judgement.
REMOTION FILM 06BEST EXECUTION
Evidences how an execution or order-routing decision was governed - which venue, what timing, how the order was handled.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Define and test counterfactual evidence for venue, timing and handling decisions without turning the research system into an adviser.
REMOTION FILM 07BARRISTERS' CHAMBERS
Evidences how a chambers' recurring decision seams - instruction, evidence-readiness, professional risk - were governed.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Map the recurring decision seams in chambers and test an evidence record that remains useful to accountable professionals.
REMOTION FILM 08LEGAL OPERATIONS
Evidences how a firm's cross-case risk decisions - intake, AML, supervision, deadlines, Ai-assisted work - were governed.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Co-design a cross-case risk model and validate whether it improves oversight without displacing professional accountability.
REMOTION FILM 09PROFESSIONAL SPORT
Evidences the decisions a professional team is answerable for - substitution, selection, injury, recruitment.
RESEARCH QUESTION
Investigate decision evidence and credible alternatives across selection, substitution, injury and recruitment with a professional team.
A DIFFERENT DOMAIN?
If your organisation owns a consequential decision environment and wants to study who should decide, under what authority and with what evidence, we would like to hear the question.
